Re: Proposed test cases (%_, %%. %-)

Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

> I think Frank was in a hurry, and meant to use A: instead
> of include: (Unless I'm missing something.)

ACK, should be A in these cases.  Dunno if I was in a hurry,
lack of caffeine is also plausible.  

The "macro mania" could be extended to do weird things with
%{s} or %{S} resulting in labels with an "@" or a "%40".  

Any quoted string madness deserves its own test group, that
is no "macro mania", that's sick.  Ignoring the question how
quoted strings and quoted pairs have to be encoded for YAML.

 Frank