Re: Implementation certification procedure

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> > What about it guys?  I would "certainly" vote for jSPF as "certified", but
> > what about the next implementation that comes up?  What is the procedure?  Do
> > we elect a review panel?  Bring back the council?  Have a general vote of
> > everyone on spf-devel?  Did we have a procedure written, but forgot about it?
> 
> Maybe any implementation that passes the test suite should be conditionally
> certified - with the person(s) or organization doing the test listed 
> as part of the certification.  That is probably good enough.  There are
> already lots of ways to screw up SPF even if you get all the
> ip,mfrom,helo + DNS -> result mappings correct.  (Like the every popular
> "check behind an MX".)

I really do not carry much weight but I agree with this.  I think it is 
the right thing to do (TM)[or what ever is put for a common saying].  I 
like this idea and I would really like all the cerified to have such a 
statement/feature.

just my 2 cents.

--
Boyd Gerber <[email protected]>
ZENEZ	1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047