Re: New libspf2 release

On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 18:34 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> One of the Ubuntu devs should have just mailed you a patch.  I haven't seen 
> it.

While his patch prevented the abort(), it didn't fix the bug.

I believe that I have fixed the bug, and I have taken the unusual step
of replacing the 1.2.8 tarball on the web site, rather than updating to
1.2.9, all users please note.

New md5sum: 824d62a83e76108f8e21a39e1ae2ad62 libspf2-1.2.8.tar.gz

S.

> ...... Original Message .......
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:22:44 +0100 Shevek <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:25 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 15 October 2008 16:10, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> >> > Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >
> >> > The old one:
> >> >
> >> > $ /usr/local/libspf2-1.2.5/bin/spfquery -ip 127.0.0.1 -sender
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > pass
> >> >
> >> > spfquery: localhost is always allowed.
> >> > Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: localhost is always allowed.)
> >> > client-ip=127.0.0.1; [email protected];
> >> >
> >> > but the new one:
> >> >
> >> > $ /usr/local/libspf2-1.2.8/bin/spfquery -ip 127.0.0.1 -sender
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > spf_interpret.c:60   Error: spf_record is NULL
> >> > Aborted
> >> >
> >> > Am I missing something? Is there any kind of changelog anywhere?
> >> >
> >> No.  I don't think you're missing anything.  I get the same error here.
> >> 
> >> Shevek?
> >
> >No, I see it, you're right, this is an unfortunate interaction between
> >my refactoring and Hannah's.
> >
> >Give me 30 minutes or so, this isn't trivial.
> >
> >S.
> >
> >
> 
>