Re: [spf-discuss] Re: New libspf2 release
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:20:52 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel,gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think the presence of special processing for localhost is a anachronism > that should be deprecated and eventually removed. There is nothing in RFC > 4408 that says to give special treatment for localhost addresses. > > We removed the equivalent from pyspf two or three years ago and the > released Mail::SPF never supported it. You can reuse the SPF machinery for recognizing local addresses if the SPF library supports passing a policy without looking it up (as does pyspf). At connect, pass a policy like "v=spf1 ip4:127.0.0.0/8 ip4:192.168.0.0/16" and treat the connection as "local" on a Pass (and skip normal SPF checking). The "local" policy should be configurable. You could also reject on fail for the local policy for a consistent and configurable blacklist (e.g. use -exists: on selected ip blacklists). -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.