Re: include: result confusion?

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Hannah Schroeter wrote:

> table in section 5.2 (recursive result of None should cause the include
> mechanism to throw PermError).
> 
> A test for that passed before the update (with libspf2 1.2.5), however
> fails now.
> 
> Am I correct in my interpretation? Should this get fixed again, so that
> a None from the included record should result in a PermError overall?

You are correct.  I am tasked with making libspf2 pass the test suite.
I am behind.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.