Re: Grammar Requires Backtracking

On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, William Ahern wrote:

> Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires backtracking?
> 
> Perhaps it would have been wise to have included a %-encoded forward-slash,
> as was done for spaces.
> 
> Anybody open to such an amendment?

The immediate need is to incorporate all errata into a non test track
RFC that is as compatible as possible with the existing installed base.

When that is done, there is SPF3, which is just a collection of ideas
at the moment.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.