Re: Problem getting python-policyd-spf to reject on Permerror
"David Jones via spf-devel" <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:28:44 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/14/2017 03:16 PM, G.W. Haywood via spf-devel wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, David Jones via spf-devel wrote: >=20 >> Wow!=C2=A0 There are a lot of SPF problems out there. >=20 > Of the _very_ approximately two-thirds of mail-sending domains which > have SPF records, less approximately one-eighth have bad SPF records. > After looking at more than a million records, it still surprises me > how creative people can be.=C2=A0 And you're allowed ONE record, right? > Check out 'mrlinfo.org'. >=20 >> I wish there were a way to bounce the emails back to admins and >> responsible parties but allow the message through at the same time. >=20 > I have written a milter which could do that, but if you think about it > a little I don't think you'll really want to go there. >=20 Wow! Unbelievable. I have sent them an email trying to help get a=20 correct SPF record. We will see if their IT support fixed it. Check out zayo.com. They seem to have listed all of their own IP space.=20 Any infected computer on their network could send an email spoofing=20 zayo.com and it would pass SPF checks. Funny thing is their corporate=20 email is hosted on Google and they don't even have the standard Google=20 include in all of that. --=20 David Jones