Re: SPFv3 proposal: rawfail result
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 02/03/2011 09:28 PM, Michael Deutschmann wrote: > On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >> I do see potential usefulness in requesting that forwarded messages get >> rejected. It could help ensure a direct transfer between sender and receiver, > "/all" is insufficent for that purpose, as it will not block SRS > forwarders, or pull-based arrangements. SRS documents the forward - your domain is not in the return-path (apart from being encoded in the localpart). Pull-based is still direct.