Re: SPFv3 proposal: rawfail result
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> No one should avoid publishing "-all" because there are clueless receivers. > > How about clueless forwarders? Receivers choose their (legitimate) forwarders, so a clueless forwarder is still a clueless receiver. (A receiver with a clue would certainly *not* want email "forwarded" by random MTAs that they did not request to do so.) If a receiver is forced to deal with a badly configured forwarder, then a simple whitelist accomodates that without causing problems with SPF. -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.