Re: SenderID is dead
Dotzero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dotzero <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Hal <[email protected]> wrote: >> Microsoft has removed most SenderID information from its website, and in >> particular http://www.microsoft.com/senderid now redirects to a Forefront anti- >> SPAM product page. It seems like it is time to move the SenderID vs SPF >> discussion to a more past-tense wording, which hopefully encourages greater >> adoption of SPF. >> >> http://hal2020.com/2011/05/02/has-microsoft-put-the-nail-in-the-coffin-on- >> senderid/ >> >> > > My understanding is that this is likely only a temporary situation. > Microsoft still uses SIDF. Personally I'd prefer that everyone not get > in an uproar. SIDF is what it is and those who use it are who they > are. My personal recommendation to folks when I give email > authentication training is that they use spf2.0/mfrom with the same > contents as their spf1 record. > > Everyones time would be much better served by a discussion on whether > (I am supportive) to move SPF to standards track (remember, it is > still experimental) within IETF. This could either be through working > group or as an independent submission through openspf. > It appears it is a temporary issue (which tehy are fixing) .... it can be reached if you use http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/safety/content/technologies/senderid/wizard/default.aspx