Re: Re: Case-sensitive status
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 05:51:51 PM Julian Mehnle wrote: > Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > From my experience I strongly doubt any significant software packages > > > consuming SPF result codes do so in a case-sensitive manner, but of > > > course that's only a gut feeling. > > > > Anybody from SA, or someone familiar with its code, on the list that > > can confirm this? > > I'm not familiar with the SpamAssassin code, but I looked anyway: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plug > in/SPF.pm?view=markup#l336 > > See the //i regexp option in line 355? It matches case-insensitively. > > That is also the only file in the SA code base (as of 3.3.2) consuming > Received-SPF headers. I checked pypolicyd-spf, which is the Postfix policy server for SPF I developed and it does not make any assumptions about the case of the result code (it downcases and then sets appropriate case to give a consistent presentation in SPF Received headers, but that would be trivial to change). I think it should be fine. Scott K