RE: Re: More about the SPF RRTYPE
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF81B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Kitterman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 6:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: More about the SPF RRTYPE > > > Actually Scott could publish his draft "as is", changing the draft name > > from I-D.xxx-kitterman-yyy or similar to I-D.4408bis-yyy in a 4408bis WG > > later is common practice. > > Scott needs to find some time to beat it into a reasonably stable state > first. It might be possible to get the XML source for RFC4408 from the RFC Editor, if that's how it was submitted to them. It can be tedious to take the text raw and put it into XML, but it has been done...