Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter

Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:06:36 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss
Message-ID <1404852.mlcNgcJzj6@scott-latitude-e6320>
On Friday, December 16, 2011 09:40:14 PM HECTOR SANTOS wrote:
> This effort definitely needs a co-chair the counteract any ill 
> direction this may take.I already see a security problem with the is 
> proposed scope extension for the same reasons that any payload 
> technology, i.e, Sender-ID, had - forcing high overhead on receivers 
> to receive the DATA payload.  

Think if it the other way around.  Think of it as an additional tool that's 
avaialable if you decide to receive DATA.  It's not meant to force anything.


Scott K