Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter

On Dec 19, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> A substantial number of people behind this effort have no skin in the game in terms of the old MARID debates.  For example, I'm not even an active SPF proponent (I prefer DKIM) and I wasn't part of MARID, but I'm helping to advance this work because there's a need to encourage convergence on a single, standard protocol in terms of path authorization, and there are some things that want to build on it, but having SPF at Experimental is sometimes an issue.  So it really is time for this to happen.  I'm willing to put the work in, and circulating the charter is a call for consensus and for the like-minded to pitch in.

I'm in this boat, here, although I am an active SPF proponent.

Ready to pitch in; no issues with the clarity or scope of the charter!

-= Tim