Re: SPF and bouncing
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <%[email protected]> |
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > If you don't accept DSNs, you don't get notified about mistyped > addresses. There is logically no way around that. If you don't send You can do what we're (TINW) already doing: use blacklists to terrorize every mail admin into verifying mailbox existence in-transaction. So typo notification comes via in-transaction 5xx and not a bounce. Sure, a bounce will probably be involved at some point, going from your own smarthost to your own incoming mail repository. But that's an in-bailiwick bounce. A spam can't pretend to be such a bounce, so those *can* be given absolute right-of-way. It's the bounce arising when someone else's backup MX can't deliver to that same someone else's incoming mail repository that is the problem. ---- Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]>