Re: SPF and bouncing
alan <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:25:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 11:45 06/04/2012 Friday, G.W. Haywood wrote: >Hi there, > >On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Michael Deutschmann wrote: > >>Recently I've been pondering one simple question: >> >>"Is it okay, on the modern internet, to send a bounce message outside >> of one's own bailiwick, when the original message had an SPF Pass >> result?" > >One simple answer. No. > >I really can't see why the thread has trundled on for so long. > >Incidentally I see more spammers (far more, both in absolute terms and >as a proportion) than genuine mail senders using SPF, and the senders >of genuine mail screw up their SPF records far more often and in more >imaginative ways than the spammers do. It almost drives me to despair. +1 ips whitlisted against SPF fail are the most numerous whitlists any of our users have (most are non srs forwarders, non-rewriting mailinglist exploders etc)