Re: SPF and SERVFAIL
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <%[email protected]> |
(This is my third attempt to post this particular message. The previous two were mysteriously blackholed -- my mail logs show normal delivery to mx-1.listbox.com and yet they have never appeared in the archives or been returned to me. Two posts by other people have appeared in the meantime, so the list as a whole doesn't appear to be dead. One longshot theory is that my original draft may have been spam-filtered because I quoted the mail-from of a message I'm pretty sure was a phish. So I'm making one more try with that address redacted.) On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Wayne Doust wrote: > They also do not collect statistics; do no reporting and probably > aren't aware of where (if any) log files are stored. This makes it > difficult for them to resolve issues in part 1. I do review my own logs every month, but I probably wouldn't notice the sort of issue you complain about, for the simple reason that I already accept hundreds of SPF-related 4xx's per month as *baseline noise*. They appear to be mostly actual spam/phish/etc. (I only see the MAIL FROM:, but surprisingly often that's enough to tell. Eg: 185 attempts allegedly from [redacted] last April - a bank in a foreign country.) The reason for the deferral is usually that the DNS server of the purported sender domain barfs on Type 99 record lookups. ---- Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]>