Re: Actual results of testsuite runs, anyone?
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:52:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | Business Management Systems |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/05/2012 02:59 PM, Scott Kitterman expounded in part: > There are three relevant cases in the testsuite: > > invalid-domain-empty-label, > invalid-domain-long, and > invalid-domain-long-via-macro. > > Those tests pass with either "permerror" or "fail". Unfortunately, > only the success is usually reported, not the actual result. If you > have such result for your product handy, would you please post it? > Pyspf produces the 'preferred' result in all three of those cases. I didn't > go back and look at the test suite to see which those were. The preferred result is permerror for those cases (for tests with multiple passing results, the first is preferred - based on my judgment of the "rough consensus"). > > Here's the full output from the test run: > > WARN: spfonly in rfc4408-tests.yml, 4.4/1: fail preferred to none > WARN: txttimeout in rfc4408-tests.yml, 4.4/1: fail preferred to temperror > WARN: spfoverride in rfc4408-tests.yml, 4.5/5: pass preferred to fail > WARN: multitxt1 in rfc4408-tests.yml, 4.5/5: pass preferred to permerror > WARN: multispf2 in rfc4408-tests.yml, 4.5/6: permerror preferred to pass > .. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 2 tests in 0.361s > Now we'll need two versions of the test suite - or a parameter to test 4408 vs 4408bis.