Re: Wacky SPF Policy
[email protected] Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:53:38 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "fspfdiscuss" == alan <[email protected]> writes: fspfdiscuss> a the mails in this listing are from <[email protected]> fspfdiscuss> to <[email protected]> fspfdiscuss> <[email protected]> fspfdiscuss> so why are you blaming pobox.com ??? Ouch. eastmeadow does not use pobox as an MX. I lept to the conclusion that they had outsourced to pobox.com. Does anyone know why is pobox storing some record of some spam sent from a random IP from [email protected]? Looking at http://spf.pobox.com/[email protected]&ip=65.254.18.67 which the delivery failure mentions, I get a description of some spam sent from that IP, under my address. Does pobox offer a SPF service that eastmeadow is maybe improperly using? Why would pobox be storing an SPF failure record like this? Are they're storing all the SPF failures in the universe?