Re: Setting up a TMDA patch repository

It might be better to make a tmda2 project at SF.

I have asked SF support what happens to projects like this and asked if we 
could get developers added

We'll see what they say

tom
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: Setting up a TMDA patch repository


> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:50:47PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> So, I was thinking about starting a repository for these patches.
>> Initially, this will just be a collection of contributed patches and
>> nothing more.
>
> I was thinking along the same lines myself; I just haven't gotten around
> to dedicating a box to it yet. My personal preference is for a wiki,
> because without some documentation and explaination, most patches are
> pretty incomprehensible even for the average programmer.
>
> Qmail has been maintained in a similar fashion for many years, due to
> the inability to redistribute a modified source tree. So, there's no
> reason TMDA couldn't exist forever without a new fork, although that
> might be necessary somewhere down the line if the list of
> non-discretionary patches gets too large.
>
> I've been trying to take a bigger hand in bug-hunting and feature
> patches, but I personally have no desire at this time to maintain the
> code base. So unless someone else does, I think the patch wiki is the
> current best way forward.
>
> If no one else does it before then, I'll probably slap something
> wiki-ish (and therefore more or less self-maintaining) together on a
> forthcoming CodeGnome web server.
>
> -- 
> Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/
> _____________________________________________
> tmda-users mailing list ([email protected])
> http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
>
>