Re: Extended Expiration?
Mark Horn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.tmda.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2006-10-24, David Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >How difficult would it be to add this as an option? >ACTION_EXPIRE_DATED is already there, so could it be done in a way >that if ACTION_ANCIENT_DATED and the associated variable for the >time threshold are not both currently set, then it simply ignores >the routine and automatically falls back to the standard settings? I could certainly look into doing it that way. Is there a benefit to this way that I can't think of? The way I was thinking of doing it is something like this in Defaults.py: if not vars().has_key('ACTION_ANCIENT_DATED'): ACTION_ANCIENT_DATED = %(ACTION_EXPIRE_DATED)s I'd still have to add a decision point in the code and based on the age of the address, either execute the EXPIRED or ANCIENT action. Adding the decision point seems like a trivial amount of code. Is there some advantage to the way you're suggesting that I don't see?