Re: tmda-check-address --all

On 2006-11-03, Jason R. Mastaler <[email protected]> wrote:
> I will say though that I do not want to add any more checking code to
> tmda-filter, because that file is essentially byte-compiled and loaded
> every time an incoming message invokes it.  

Right, and on top of that it has to fork a sub-process.  So, yeah
I can see that it's already at its limit.

> I'd much rather see tmda-check-address extended.  Perhaps '-M' should
> even be moved there from tmda-filter.  Can you dig it?

Yes, I think so.  But I also think adding this to tmda-check-address
is going to be more work than adding it to tmda-filter.  I basically
need to recreate tmda-filter in tmda-check-address so that the latter
can handle all of the same contingencies that the former handles.

What would help me is if I moved some of the functions in
tmda-rfilter into a module.  Can I try tackling that, too or is
that a bigger problem than it seems?