Re: two small updates
Stephen Warren <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:35:51 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.tmda.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bernard Johnson wrote: > When packaging tmda for Fedora, I came across these two things that > should probably be updated. > > A reviewer noted that it was best to have the tofmipd program inactive > when installed with chkconfig. Also, a reload function should be > provided in the init script (even if it simply does the same as restart): > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tmda/tofmipd-init.patch?root=extras&rev=1.1&view=auto That patch looks sane to me. Just one question though: In the chkconfig line, the 2345 got removed, which is I assume what disabled the service by default. If I then do "chkconfig --on tofmipd", how does chkconfig know which runlevels to enable the service in. I was vaguely under the impression that the chkconfig line in the init file was the set of run-levels that the service should be enabled in if it gets enabled, and presumably there's a script in the RPM that gets run postinstall that is running "chkconfig --on tofmipd" to actually enable the service? But, perhaps I misunderstand how chkconfig and rpm interact... > I also noticed that the INSTALL file > (http://tmda.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tmda/trunk/tmda/INSTALL?revision=2059&view=markup) > says " > A local copy of the HTML documentation matching this release is included > in the htdocs directory." > > I believe that the up to date documentation is the wiki, right? Yes. Although there was some talk of including an up-to-date snapshot in each release. I think that happened (if there are docs in the release tarballs, then I guess it did!) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF3xfnhk3bo0lNTrURAglqAJ9eKot6SYa3Nsz+UquoRS2abt2nSACgmmkk u/pc9OX0toXpS2BTXjSfhTs= =mI3X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----