Re: tmda-ofmipd: Internal support for SSL via tlslite package

Stephen Warren <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:26:46 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.tmda.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bernard Johnson wrote:
> When you implement this [STARTTLS], consider:
> 
> -tls = on/off/optional
> 
> on       = tls is always on and required
> off      = tls is always off and not announced
> optional = tls is announced and client can use tls or proceed w/o tls

I knew that somebody was going to ask for that (the "optional" flag) :-)

My question is, though, why? At least in my environment, if I roll out
SMTP AUTH, then I want to make 100% sure that it's running over an
encrypted channel so as not to expose passwords. For that reason, I
specifically don't want to enable the "optional" value you mentioned on
my systems.

Is CRAM-MD5 safe even over a plain-text channel? Perhaps that would
explain it. AUTH PLAIN certainly isn't...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF4dTmhk3bo0lNTrURAlbUAKDVpnF9UIf62J62MVy0EyYanJoGuQCgio/p
h2beVElDMsXBrZwfn16fXb0=
=+nki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----