Re: Configuration Question

Gregory Carter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dave,

   Thanks for the reply.

:-)

   I have actually made progress since then.   The reason why my reply 
confirmation messages were bouncing is that although I read about the 
issues with "-" and "+" in sendmail, I selected "-" which won't work.  
In order for the reply tagged confirmation message to reach procmail for 
further processing, I had to change the RECIPIENT_DELIMITER to "+".

By the way this is a SuSe 10.0 system.

   I now have tmda also filling out its proper log files, and whitelist 
properly.

   On to the next problem!!

:-)

   I have a global configuration I am using, so I am not using per user 
.tmda directories.   procmail is my deliver agent of choice and I 
haven't used procmail in about 8 years, so I am having issues 
remembering certain things.   Like for example, to deliver mail to a 
given user I have setup a procmail router-config file for tmda to call 
in /etc/procmail-tmda-router.

I set my delivery line as such in /etc/tmdarc:

DELIVERY = "|/usr/bin/procmail /etc/procmail-tmda-router"

My question is, at the moment here is my /etc/procmail-tmda-router, so far:

# .procmailrc
# routes incoming mail to appropriate mailboxes
PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin
MAILDIR=/var/spool/mail  
DEFAULT=/var/spool/mail/$USER
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail-router.log
SHELL=/bin/sh

Right now, procmail will not put the mail into the proper user file in 
/var/spool/mail, and instead puts these annoying little directories in 
my /var/spool/mail directory:

new cur tmp

Here is a cut from my procmail log file:

 From [email protected]  Mon Nov 20 14:23:09 2006
 Subject: Testing
  Folder: 
/var/spool/mail/new/1164054189.11050_0.smtp1                     1547

Any suggestion would be most appreciated.   Meanwhile I will continue my 
research.

Thanks!

-gc

David Hoffman wrote:
> You'll need to read further into the configuration documentation. 
> Check the following link and look at "Extension Addresses"
>  
> http://wiki.tmda.net/PreConfiguration
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>  
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Gregory Carter <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:53:17 AM
> Subject: Configuration Question
>
> Hello and Greetings my fellow comrades in this war on SPAM.
>
> I have loaded, configured TMDA on my mail hub and I am testing it.
>
> However, after reading the documentation it isn't very clear how the
> confirmation part of the process works.
>
> For example, I send a message, and I get a reply back the mail hub to
> confirm or whitelist my Email address.
>
> The problem I C though is that the reply address is tagged for 
> confirmation.
> (i.e. [email protected]).
>
> If I send a confirmation to this address it obviously bounces as no such
> user exists on my mail hub.
>
> Obviously the reply tagged address doesn't exist on the mail hub, and  
> it bounces with user unknown.   I looked into the documentation further,
> but I do not see any requirements that I need to modify sendmail any
> further with regards to setting up inbound email confirmation or
> recognition.
>
> I am puzzled because the test link on the site sends out a reply
> confirmation that does work with a tagged confirmation reply address, so
> it must work somehow.
>
> So, my question is how does one go about modifying sendmail configs so
> that sendmail recognizes the inbound confirmation for whitelisting the
> address?
>
> Or, is this a outbound template modification I need to do to redirect
> the confirmations to the original sender (i.e. [email protected]) for
> sendmail?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -gc
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> tmda-users mailing list ([email protected])
> http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
>
>
> Sponsored Link
>
> Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420,000 Mortgage for $1,399/mo - 
> Calculate new house payment 
> <http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9132-16414&moid=4116>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.