Re: tmda-ofmipd + TLS made simpler

Amitai Schlair <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Amitai Schlair wrote:
>> I've been happily using tmda-ofmipd wrapped with stunnel on port
>> 465 (SMTPS) for quite some time. Upon noticing and reading through
>> the ofmipd-stunnel-xinetd example in the TMDA distribution, I
>> decided to also support TLS on port 587. In my case, it turned out
>> to be quite a bit simpler than the example, so I wanted to report
>> on my findings here.
>>
>> Given:
>> * a long-running tmda-ofmipd on localhost:8025
>> * a long-running stunnel on port 465 hooked up to tmda-ofmipd
>
> The purpose of the wrapper scripts etc. was:
>
> 1) To allow tmda-ofmipd to see the real client IP address (via the
> environment variables that stunnel sets up), rather than simply
> reporting all connections as being from localhost.

Ah! I didn't realize that. Definitely worth a mention in ofmipd- 
stunnel-xinetd/README.txt.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.