Re: virtual users ?
Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Kavadas wrote: > is it possible to "NOT" require a local virtual user account to be > present until the authentication process ? > > in this way the installation can be fully automated for users wanting > to "enable" tmda for there addresses. > > e.g > > [email protected] authenticating via pop3 (via our internal pop3 > server) wants to "enable" tmda for his email address. > > [email protected] does NOT want to enable tmda so no account is setup > > am i making sense ? I don't think so:-) TMDA is just re-using the existing authentication mechanism. So, if your users are logging in to SMTP/POP/IMAP/..., then they already have a virtual user setup - TMDA is just authenticating against the same virtual user DB. Well, I suppose you could configure TMDA to point at a completely separate auth DB, but I'm not really sure why you'd do that. Can you elaborate a little on what you're trying to achieve? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF4kqahk3bo0lNTrURAnGXAJ9NX4qKwnr4tYEPPlBA86yEUDuUFQCdGoQK i6q9Q5DSEu4xNOm2jjhqWXc= =6T/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----