Re: Munging hyphenated addresses.

Nils Vogels <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user
Organization IS-Root Internet Solutions
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Silowyi,

Silowyi Dracotiri wrote on 7-9-2007 17:56:
> TMDA appears to be munging addresses with hyphens in them even when they
> don't contain tmda tokens.  For example:
>
> 9	Sep  5 16:56:14 mail postfix/pipe[8679]: CE90C9395C0:
> to=<jj4th-test@other_domain.com>, ***relay=tmda***, delay=1, status=sent
> (mail.some_domain.com) 
> 10	Sep  5 16:56:14 mail postfix/qmgr[3235]: CE90C9395C0: removed 
> 11	Sep  5 16:56:17 mail postfix/smtp[10432]: 4A6EA9398EC:
> to=<jj4th@other_domain.com>, ***relay=mail.other_domain.com[<removed>]***,
> delay=3, status=sent (250 OK <S860D>) 
> 12	Sep  5 16:56:17 mail postfix/qmgr[3235]: 4A6EA9398EC: removed
>   
For one, this is why I personally use the + as a seperator :-)

When looking at your logfiles, your postfix decides to treat mail
differently between line 9 and line 11 (look at the relay= entries). I'd
start by telling postfix that it only needs to do that in case of
multiple seperators, since TMDA usually uses more than one seperator.
Maybe you could even specify your filter so that only real
TMDA-generated addresses are sent through TMDA for verification.

Greets,

Nils
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFG4ZPeMzNX/a06Wq0RAjglAJ9RmYEfth8KI8h+dBgTyaNWMtE2+ACdEKC3
q1t35uhVKOjQIANcmuMvZxA=
=0GDD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.