Re: Munging hyphenated addresses.
Nils Vogels <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | IS-Root Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Silowyi, Silowyi Dracotiri wrote on 7-9-2007 17:56: > TMDA appears to be munging addresses with hyphens in them even when they > don't contain tmda tokens. For example: > > 9 Sep 5 16:56:14 mail postfix/pipe[8679]: CE90C9395C0: > to=<jj4th-test@other_domain.com>, ***relay=tmda***, delay=1, status=sent > (mail.some_domain.com) > 10 Sep 5 16:56:14 mail postfix/qmgr[3235]: CE90C9395C0: removed > 11 Sep 5 16:56:17 mail postfix/smtp[10432]: 4A6EA9398EC: > to=<jj4th@other_domain.com>, ***relay=mail.other_domain.com[<removed>]***, > delay=3, status=sent (250 OK <S860D>) > 12 Sep 5 16:56:17 mail postfix/qmgr[3235]: 4A6EA9398EC: removed > For one, this is why I personally use the + as a seperator :-) When looking at your logfiles, your postfix decides to treat mail differently between line 9 and line 11 (look at the relay= entries). I'd start by telling postfix that it only needs to do that in case of multiple seperators, since TMDA usually uses more than one seperator. Maybe you could even specify your filter so that only real TMDA-generated addresses are sent through TMDA for verification. Greets, Nils
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQFG4ZPeMzNX/a06Wq0RAjglAJ9RmYEfth8KI8h+dBgTyaNWMtE2+ACdEKC3 q1t35uhVKOjQIANcmuMvZxA= =0GDD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----