Re: tmda, yet still getting spamed

here is a good example of what i was talking about...

Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:41:19 -0500
From: "Edwina Hodges" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
Subj: Re: Edwina
Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming                                           (1549)

Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:41:19 -0500
From: "Edwina Hodges" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
Subj: Re: Edwina
Actn: CONFIRM pending 1199907652.71672                                  (1549)

even though this shows like this in here... i still end up with this
email in my INBOX.


On Jan 9, 2008 12:46 AM, Todd A. Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:46:23PM -0500, alexus wrote:
>
> > i do have [email protected], but i though tmda would look at
> > "Sndr", not "From", as From: is really easy to spoof
>
> AFAIK, TMDA looks at the envelope sender, which *is* easy to spoof. You
> have a couple of choices:
>
>    - Use a more thorough headers recipe, rather than a from recipe.
>
>    - Use a procmail recipe with SPF support before tmda to filter out
>      joe-jobs.
>
>    - Use bogofilter on all tmda-accepted mail.
>
> I include both of the following in my own procmail recipes before tmda:
>
>    http://www2.codegnome.org:59321/scripting/showscript.php?script=spf.proc
>
>    http://www2.codegnome.org:59321/scripting/showscript.php?script=hashcash.proc
>
> and feed all results to bogofilter afterwards. TMDA solves one *type* of
> spam problem; it is not really a standalone solution.
>
> --
> "Oh, look: rocks!"
>        -- Doctor Who, "Destiny of the Daleks"
>
> _____________________________________________
> tmda-users mailing list ([email protected])
> http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
>



-- 
http://alexus.org/