Re: Doxygen
"Fredrik Jervfors" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Not that we have the energy to do something new, but I like the sound > of Doxygen - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxygen > > It looks to be compatible with PHPDoc with some nice additions and > might be more powerful. I especially like the idea that you can document > function parameters in a way that makes them more likely to be documented, > updated, etc., which is a constant problem in SM. > > Anyone used it before? I've seen it around, but I haven't tried it myself. I don't mind if we change, but I won't mind if we don't either. A quick look at the Wikipedia page didn't give me any clues about why Doxygen would be better for documenting "function parameters in a way that makes them more likely to be documented, updated, etc." Could you please elaborate on that? Sincerely, Fredrik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php ----- squirrelmail-devel mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: [email protected] List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-devel