Re: Re: sqwebmail and vchkpw
Michael D Schleif <[email protected]> Sun, 9 May 2004 10:45:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.sqwebmail |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* James A Baker <[email protected]> [2004:05:03:23:43:31-0500] scribed: > Sam, > > The messages regarding vpopmail which are displayed when building > sqwebmail (no matter how prominent) are obviously not cutting it in > this regard. > > You think there's any possibility of cutting the noise on this list by > adding a prominent note mentioning "vpopmail needs to be upgraded" to > the list's welcome message?? -- Maybe that would help. You think? > > Just a thought. Just a thought from somebody new to sqwebmail. Yes, the first thing I see when I invoke `make' is the disclaimer: ---------------------------------------------------- NOTE All questions regarding ANY vpopmail-related problems, such as compiling/building failures, or login errors should be referred to the vpopmail mailing list. Vpopmail questions sent to the sqwebmail or Courier mailing lists will be IGNORED. ---------------------------------------------------- IMHO, as clear as this implementation is, it would be at least an order of magnitude _greater_ clearer if that disclaimer is the dead *LAST* thing I see when make completes. Have you ever typed `make', hit enter and went to take a dump? I don't know anybody who sits around trying to follow all of the scrolling data during make ;> What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAnlI2LUOEaCtUQpwRAmMIAJ4wiH0jgXNZObyG017buHI151QftQCcDhwO g6+viSKshJcRux3qB7Hi518= =p6Zf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----