Re: content encoding etc. (rewritten)

Reinke Bonte writes:

>> >> 2) I believe that both UTF-8 and UTF-7 character sets should have
>> >the > UNICODE_WORD_WRAPPABLE flag set.
>> > 
>> > UNICODE_WORD_WRAPPABLE depends on both language and script.
>> > Domestic charsets almostly correspond to language-script, but on
>> > UTF context they may not be determined.
>> 
>> What exactly is the issue with flowed text and East Asian character
>> sets?
>> 
> 
> East Asian languages don't use spaces so you can wrap after almost any
> character (there are defined exceptions, which are different per
> language).

I wonder if there's a convenient table on unicode.org that identifies the 
characters involved.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAqpx4x9p3GYHlUOIRAkgMAJ4vUQLSFF3Cv4JC2XGrAYBc7aNuCQCbBFOV
PEK6Z2uJNJQW66e79P86kyA=
=8dVa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----