Re: Gmail 'less secure app access'
Jigme Datse <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:42:25 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.sylpheed.claws.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:18:09 -0000 Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:52:09 -0600 > lmfrm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's important to boycott such monopolies and flock to > > alternatives, if not to let Google die off, to save what little > > privacy and security you have. > > +1 > > with regards My response to this is pretty much the same. If I can't realistically make Claws Mail work (yeah two factor authentication, great I don't have a cell phone and certainly not a smart phone and I'm sure many will tell me various versions of, "yeah you can make it work" from people who haven't tried actually making it work) then it will be just a couple of my accounts being inaccessible, and in that case (if I understand correctly) Google "close your account due to inactivity" (I get messages of that sort to accounts that I have told them to delete all references to, the "The database doesn't allow it" argument won't fly with me, because while I may not be able to *delete* records, I can always delete the content of the records...). Sorry... ranty...