Re: slow send
Josef Dalcolmo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.sylpheed.claws.windows |
|---|---|
| Organization | von Hoerner & Sulger GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> ¿Any timing? Anyway, there are much more efficient methods of > sending such large files than mail. Try ftp or http. No, but surely sending is at least 10 times slower than receiving and notably slower than in other mail applications. Note I have a 100MB/s connection to my mail server. When sending mail do my Business partners ftp or http is not an option. > > (I have tested this with Sylpheed 0.8.3claws-w32) > > I suppose the bottleneck is the "byte counting" and and the progress > > bar. I would suggest to omit the byte counting feature. > > Do you like frozen and unresponsive applications? I don't think so. No. But the progress bar alone might do, not EVERY byte needs to be counted. I did not look at the code (would not understand it anyway), this is just the only thing I could think of. Note also: one could send the mail in the background then the application doesn't have to be frozen! Regards - Josef ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en