[sylpheed:36966] Re: Yahoo since 20 of October 2020 and Sylpheed
Gene Goldenfeld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.sylpheed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Javier, Not clear if this is about a mobile device. On my Win 10 desktop, where I use Mailwasher Pro as a filter, I had checked OAUTH for Yahoo, but that failed last week, but IMAP does work. I've used Fastmail out of Australia as a primary email provider for ten years, instead of my ISP. It is excellent, allows a bunch of alternate addresses and is not costly (~$35 USD/2 years). But I'm not sure how that would solve the Yahoo issue, which I haven't taken on yet on my iPad. Gene On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:39:34 +0200 Javier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > it was just mentioned to the list a few weeks ago, but finally, for > those who use it, Yahoo is telling that will switch to per app > password. > > Ok, that won't be a big deal, but in the notification they also said, > even in help pages isn't said the same, that passwords will be > temporary in a per session basis. > > Or, in other words, from what I understand, every time we check mail, > we will need a new app password. > > For me that would be a madness and stop using Yahoo, as I have to > manage several accounts and that will take about a couple of hours > daily. Not kidding. > > And here no one has said anything, but Sylpheed is not prepared for > the alternative, that would be using Oauth one-time-password request. > > Or maybe I'm the only one that misunderstands that "passwords per > session" option. > > By now, I already have created app passwords and they don't expire, > but I don't know what would happen from 20 of October. > > > For those who have received the notification mails, how do you > understand it? > > Will you change your provider? > > What providers are out there that DON'T REQUEST A MOBILE PHONE > NUMBER, have IMAP or POP access and it is... realiable? > > There should be a service and/or option, if spammers signup a lot of > accounts daily on some services. > > I thought GMX would be an option, but after a long mailing they use > several (misconfigured in my opinion) blacklists and it is almost > impossible to reach the registration page as the servers just replies > with an error page. > > Regards. >