[sylpheed:36966] Re: Yahoo since 20 of October 2020 and Sylpheed

Gene Goldenfeld <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.sylpheed.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Javier,

Not clear if this is about a mobile device. On my Win 10 desktop, where
I use Mailwasher Pro as a filter, I had checked OAUTH for Yahoo, but
that failed last week, but IMAP does work.

I've used Fastmail out of Australia as a primary email provider for ten
years, instead of my ISP. It is excellent, allows a bunch of alternate
addresses and is not costly (~$35 USD/2 years). But I'm not sure how
that would solve the Yahoo issue, which I haven't taken on yet on my
iPad.

Gene


On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:39:34 +0200
Javier <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> it was just mentioned to the list a few weeks ago, but finally, for
> those who use it, Yahoo is telling that will switch to per app
> password.
> 
> Ok, that won't be a big deal, but in the notification they also said,
> even in help pages isn't said the same, that passwords will be
> temporary in a per session basis.
> 
> Or, in other words, from what I understand, every time we check mail,
> we will need a new app password.
> 
> For me that would be a madness and stop using Yahoo, as I have to
> manage several accounts and that will take about a couple of hours
> daily. Not kidding.
> 
> And here no one has said anything, but Sylpheed is not prepared for
> the alternative, that would be using Oauth one-time-password request.
> 
> Or maybe I'm the only one that misunderstands that "passwords per
> session" option.
> 
> By now, I already have created app passwords and they don't expire,
> but I don't know what would happen from 20 of October.
> 
> 
> For those who have received the notification mails, how do you
> understand it?
> 
> Will you change your provider?
> 
> What providers are out there that DON'T REQUEST A MOBILE PHONE
> NUMBER, have IMAP or POP access and it is... realiable?
> 
> There should be a service and/or option, if spammers signup a lot of
> accounts daily on some services.
> 
> I thought GMX would be an option, but after a long mailing they use
> several (misconfigured in my opinion) blacklists and it is almost
> impossible to reach the registration page as the servers just replies
> with an error page.
> 
> Regards.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.