[sylpheed:37097] Re: Gmail question
Javier <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Mar 2022 22:36:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.sylpheed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 09:16:37 -0500 "c. marlow" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I have figured it out: > > "TRASH" that is not nested is the [IMAP]/TRASH label > > [GMAIL]/TRASH is the true trash can. > > > How I figured it out: > > I tapped delete on an email and the email was moved to "TRASH" > > I opened webmail and the email in question was not in " TRASH" on > webmail, but instead was under [IMAP]/TRASH label. > > > Chris HI, I thought you already knew that Gmail hasn't a... "standard" folder structure and Gmail/Trash was the Gmail web interface Trash and Imap/Trash is a folder that they call it Imap/Trash to differentiate it. When I was asking about the icon, I was asking about your Sylpheed tree folder interface. The folder that has the trash bin icon is the actual trash folder... for Sylpheed, so when you delete something from Sylpheed, it goes to that folder. Anyway, about getting with the times, you are not getting with the times by using some IMAP mail client (despite I never used it, I think Claws supports IMAP as well; and Sylpheed has the same OAuth problems). If becomes true that enable 2 steps verification and creating an app password is enough for a mail client to work, you could continue using you POP mail client if you prefer it, are more used or just makes your workflow better. IMAP has the benefit that you control the folders on server (even with Gmail weird folder structure), and not only the inbox folder as happens with a POP mail client. Have that in mind. You are not forced to use IMAP (I still use POP, depending of I need on that moment). IMAP has been always desired over decades until finally all mail services (free) started to offer it a few years ago. Regards.