[sylpheed:37133] Re: Quoting Styles
[email protected] Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:11:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.sylpheed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:38:10 +0300 Anton Shepelev <[email protected]> wrote: > Craig: > > Steve O'Hara-Smith: > > > Duke Normandin: > > > > > > > ** Bottom-posting, text-only is the netiquette way! ** > > > > > > Interleaved posting with careful trimming of > > > quotes if you please. > > > > A. It inverts the order people normally read. > > Q. Why is top-posting so bad? > > A. Top-posting. > > Q. What is the worst thing in email and USENET postings? > > Interleaved posting *is* bottom-posting: you accurately > quote fragments of a previous message and reply to them > below each individual quotation. I don't think anybody > ever interpreted bottom-posting as replying under one huge > quotation of the entire previous message (as I did here :-) Seconded; actually I think that the worst possible behavior is a tie between top posting and uninterleaved bottom posting. The other one is texto-style composition, the streaming monstrosity that everyone can immediately recognise :-) https://i.imgur.com/b6voLxD.png