Re: Mail gateway server with amavis on CentOS 8

Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>On 17/12/2020 12:31 μ.μ., Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>>I have been using a mail gateway with 
>>postfix/amavis/clamav/spamassassin for many years on CentOS 6.
>>
>>I am now struggling to build a new system on CentOS 8 with the same 
>>components (and the same configuration) to replace the original one, 
>>but it is quite different from the original, so I will appreciate 
>>your guidance.

On 28.12.20 13:35, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>Following my above post, I would like to send an update and ask on 
>bayes database migration.
>
>I have managed to answer most of my own questions and now I have a 
>working setup.
>
>During the migration I have migrated the bayes db from the older 
>(CentOS 6) setup to the new (CentOS 8) server as follows:
>
>On original Server:
>
>   # su amavis
>   sh-4.1$ sa-learn --dbpath '/var/amavis/var/.spamassassin' --backup >
>   bayes-mailgw3.db
>
>On new server (after scp transfer and chown to amavis:amavis):
>
>   # su amavis
>   sh-4.4$ pwd
>   /var/spool/amavisd
>   sh-4.4$ sa-learn --dbpath /var/spool/amavisd/var/.spamassassin/ --clear
>   sh-4.4$ sa-learn --dbpath /var/spool/amavisd/var/.spamassassin/
>   --restore bayes-mailgw3.db
>   sh-4.4$ ls -la var/.spamassassin/
>   total 8620
>   drwx------. 2 amavis amavis    4096 Dec 21 15:23 .
>   drwx------. 4 amavis amavis    4096 Dec 16 16:53 ..
>   -rw-------. 1 amavis amavis  659456 Dec 21 15:23 bayes_seen
>   -rw-------. 1 amavis amavis 9490432 Dec 21 15:23 bayes_toks
>
>I would expect this db to be working fine and I anticipated similar 
>filtering results on both servers, but sending a test email to both 
>servers, produces different results (note: I have restarted amavisd 
>after db migration):
>
>On original server:
>
>   score=12.436 tag=-999 tag2=3.4 kill=5.2 tests=[ARCHIVE_PASSWORD=5,
>   BAYES_999=2.7, BAYES_99=3.7, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1,
>   NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN=0.934, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled
>
>On new server:
>
>   score=3.204 tagged_above=-999 required=3.4
>   tests=[ARCHIVE_PASSWORD=5, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
>   MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
>   URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled
>
>All configs have been migrated unchanged from the original to the new 
>server.
>
>Please advise on what I may be doing wrong in setting up the migrated db!
>
>Why do the two servers produce so different results in terms of BAYES 
>filtering (BAYES_999=2.7, BAYES_99=3.7 vs BAYES_00=-1.9)?

score 2.7 for BAYES_999 is manually tuned. the original is 0.2

are you sure that /var/spool/amavisd/var/.spamassassin/ is correct path?
try "locate bayes_seen" to find out.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.