Re: Bypass scanning based on recipient
Damian <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Also, I don't think @spam_lovers_maps and @bypass_spam_checks_maps
> will work because it relies on the recipient being the only address to
> receive the email. If there are other recipients, the regular
> processing occurs.
That is not true depending on how you mean it. This is what it looks
like when a single spamlover & bypasser receives a GTUBE spam mail:
> (00275-04) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInbound}, [172.21.0.1]
> <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>, mail_id: HmLW8bEk7kgq, Hits: -,
> size: 320, queued_as: 250 2.0.0 Ok, 39 ms
Here we have multiple envelope recipients:
> (00276-04) Passed SPAM {DiscardedInbound,RelayedInbound,Quarantined},
> [172.21.0.1] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>,
> quarantine: /var/lib/amavis/virusmails, Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>, mail_id: gB4RBtc0NaED, Hits:
> 1000.998, size: 337, queued_as: 250 2.0.0 Ok, 118 ms
> (00276-04) Blocked SPAM {DiscardedInbound,RelayedInbound,Quarantined},
> [172.21.0.1] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, quarantine:
> /var/lib/amavis/virusmails, Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>, mail_id: gB4RBtc0NaED, Hits:
> 1000.998, size: 337, 118 ms
So yes, the mail has been processed by SpamAssassin, but forwarded to
spamlover nonetheless.