Re: tracing bottlenecks ?

Nick Howitt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 29/10/2021 11:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> 
> On 29.10.21 15:56, [email protected] wrote:
>> I've noticed some of my emails spend up to 5 minutes in amavis checks,
>> dumb question, how to figure out where is the bottleneck ?
> 
> hard to say, maybe you could feed the file into spamassassin -D which could
> show you more.
> 
>> should I try changing max_server = 10 ? or ?
> 
> I don't know what is your current setting and how much of memory you have,
> so it's really hard to guess what you have to change.
> 
>> grep amavis /var/log/maillog shows like '980 ms', '912 ms', BUT also:
>>
>> Oct 29 15:45:22 amavis[21973]: (21973-07) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInternal},
>> ORIGINATING LOCAL [147.111.222.333]:55095 [147.33.33.44] <[email protected]>
>> -> <[email protected]>, Queue-ID: 12EBGRT227, Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>, mail_id: ffgfgarJu, Hits:
>> -2.898, size: 249274, queued_as: AAAAAA, 300681 ms
> 
> it's really too much for 250k mail, I've had problems with huge mails.
> 
> do you have any local spamassassin rules?
> 
>> 'insufficient server resources', or what can I tune ?
> 
> did you get this message or are you just guessing?
> 
I get far more info from amavis:
Oct 29 19:51:34 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) ESMTP :10024 
/var/lib/amavis/tmp/amavis-20211029T195134-23855-OHqqsWGB: 
<[email protected]> -> <[email protected]> SIZE=6147 
BODY=8BITMIME Received: from mailserver.howitts.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by 
localhost (server.howitts.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 
with ESMTP for <[email protected]>; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:51:34 +0100 (BST)
Oct 29 19:51:34 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) dkim: VALID 
Author+Sender+MailFrom signature by d=lists.samba.org, From: 
<[email protected]>, a=rsa-sha256, c=relaxed/relaxed, s=2954282, 
[email protected], ORIG [127.0.0.1]:43160, m.list(ml:samba.lists.samba.org)
Oct 29 19:51:34 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) dkim: FAILED 
third-party signature by d=samba.org, From: <[email protected]>, 
a=rsa-sha256, c=relaxed/relaxed, s=42, [email protected], ORIG 
[127.0.0.1]:43160, m.list(ml:samba.lists.samba.org), fail (message has 
been altered)
Oct 29 19:51:34 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) Checking: kZGNnm72Spa3 
[127.0.0.1] <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>
Oct 29 19:51:34 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) p001 1 Content-Type: 
text/plain, size: 2277 B, name:
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) spam-tag, 
<[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, No, score=-3.4 
tagged_above=-99 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, 
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, 
MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, 
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) dkim: candidate 
originators: From:<[email protected]>, 
Sender:<[email protected]>
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) dkim: not signing, 
empty signing domain, From: <[email protected]>
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) kZGNnm72Spa3 FWD from 
<[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, BODY=8BITMIME 
250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10026): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 
9D423C20E9FA
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) Passed CLEAN 
{RelayedInternal}, LOCAL [127.0.0.1]:43160 [2a01:4f8:192:486::2:0] 
<[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, Queue-ID: 
4A7BCC20EA07, Message-ID: 
<[email protected]>, mail_id: 
kZGNnm72Spa3, Hits: -3.4, size: 6147, queued_as: 9D423C20E9FA, 
dkim_sd=2954282:lists.samba.org, 3293 ms
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) TIMING-SA total 2967 ms 
- parse: 1.09 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (0.4%), 
get_uri_detail_list: 2.6 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 1.80 (0.1%), 
tests_pri_-950: 0.49 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.56 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 
0.40 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 293 (9.9%), check_spf: 166 (5.6%), 
poll_dns_idle: 145 (4.9%), tests_pri_20: 2607 (87.9%), check_razor2: 
2604 (87.8%), tests_pri_30: 0.71 (0.0%), check_pyzor: 0.10 (0.0%), 
tests_pri_500: 3.2 (0.1%), learn: 30 (1.0%), b_learn: 28 (0.9%), 
b_count_change: 10 (0.3%), get_report: 1.36 (0.0%)
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) size: 6147, TIMING 
[total 3296 ms] - SMTP greeting: 1.0 (0%)0, SMTP EHLO: 0.3 (0%)0, SMTP 
pre-MAIL: 0.3 (0%)0, mkdir tempdir: 0.6 (0%)0, create email.txt: 0.1 
(0%)0, SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 1.4 (0%)0, SMTP DATA: 38 (1%)1, check_init: 
0.4 (0%)1, digest_hdr: 2.7 (0%)1, digest_body_dkim: 200 (6%)7, 
collect_info: 2.9 (0%)7, mkdir parts: 1.0 (0%)8, mime_decode: 4.0 (0%)8, 
get-file-type1: 11 (0%)8, parts_decode: 0.1 (0%)8, check_header: 0.4 
(0%)8, AV-scan-1: 25 (1%)9, spam-wb-list: 0.4 (0%)9, SA msg read: 0.4 
(0%)9, SA parse: 1.6 (0%)9, SA check: 2963 (90%)99, decide_mail_destiny: 
4.0 (0%)99, notif-quar: 0.2 (0%)99, fwd-connect: 23 (1%)100, 
fwd-mail-pip: 1.9 (0%)100, fwd-rcpt-pip: 0.1 (0%)100, fwd-data-chkpnt: 
0.0 (0%)100, write-header: 1.0 (0%)100, fwd-data-contents: 0.0 (0%)100, 
fwd-end-chkpnt: 2.3 (0%)100, prepare-dsn: 0.9 (0%)100, report: 1.5 
(0%)100, main_log_entry: 3.9 (0%)100, update_snmp: 1.8 (0%)100, SMTP 
pre-response: 0.2 (0%)100, SMTP response: 0.1 (...
Oct 29 19:51:37 server amavis[23855]: (23855-04) ...0%)100, 
unlink-2-files: 0.2 (0%)100, rundown: 0.7 (0%)100

In amavisd.conf I have "$log_level = 2;" would that help diagnostics?

Nick
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.