Re: Reject mails with two different mail addresses in From Header
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Yi5EBZn/[email protected]> |
>On 12/3/2022 8:40 μ.μ., Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>this is because PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS has some exceptions, which is why >>I advised you to use something different. On 12.03.22 22:21, Nikolaos Milas wrote: >Sorry Matus if I don't understand right, but can you please clarify: > >The rule: > > L_OLEMACRO_ZIP_PW && __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS > >doesn't also depend on the original > > PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS > >rule? How will this extend the scope of the detected mails? I >understand that the original rule must get triggerred for the whole to >get triggered too. No? > >And, when you mentioned: > > T_PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS > >this was a spelling mistake which meant to be: __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS or >something I don't understand? > >Probably some things are very clear to you as an expert, but I am >missing pieces of the puzzle. > >Can you please break things down a bit? I have re-checked my last statements and to me it looks like they still apply. __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS is not PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS is not T_PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS more explanations may come next week if I (or someone else) am not lazy -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar]