Re: Reject mails with two different mail addresses in From Header
Nikolaos Milas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | National Observatory of Athens |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 14/3/2022 10:42 π.μ., Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > looks perfectly valid. Note that L_OLEMACRO_ZIP_PW and > L_FROM_2_EMAILS each score 1 point by default. > If this is not what you want, start name with __ > > ... I use L_ as prefix for local rules, __ prefixes test rules (no > score by default) and T_ prefixes test rules (score 0.01 by default). > > rules with score 0 are not evaluated unless they are prefixed with __ > >> Also, what should I do to catch (and score) ALL mails with 2 >> different mail addresses in the From header (regardless whether there >> is an encrypted zip attachment or not)? > > the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS should catch excatly this, but since the rule > name starts with __, it has no points by default. > Thank you Matus, I appreciate your help. I am studying your notes; I also found supplementary documentation to help me gain some better insight (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/writingrules). In case I need more of your valuable clarifications, I will have to disturb you a bit again. One of those is: Why use parentheses in some cases, like: (__PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS) ? Do parentheses have particular significance by modifying operation/evaluation? Thanks again, Nick