Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:45:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>I agree that DKIM designers messed this up quite much. >>But again, we are here talking about DMARC. >>On 21.11.23 12:06, Noel Butler wrote: >But they are inter-twined, DMARC just does what DKIM and SPF declare, >so any perceived DMARC issues *do* include DKIM and SPF but this is irelevant here. >On 21/11/2023 20:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>I believe the issue lies in bad formulation of condition for fo: > >>The problem I see is that with "fo=1" it should be reported, even if >>everything is okay. On 28.11.23 10:36, Noel Butler wrote: >Well, if there is a pass and a failure not "everything" is OK. Not "a pass and a failure". A DKIM pass and SPF pass. But when the SPF is not aligned, DMARC wording requires sending report for "fo=1", because of RFC something other than an aligned "pass" result. reporting 2 passes but inaligned is non-sense and quite common for mail forwarding, and mailing lists, including this one. >>Perhaps RFC 7489 needs clarification of what exactly needs to be >>reported and what not. > >7489 makes fo=1|s|d clear, perhaps fo=0 could be worded differently, >most of us, or perhaps just many of us, understand 0 means only if I did a mistake before and corrected it: Wording of fo=0 is fine, report is only send for failed DMARC check. The unaligned SPF is only issue when DKIM fails. >everything fails then send a report because thats how I see it and how >it seemed to work when first ran DMARC until I moved fo=1 because I >want to get failure reports - remember, not all failure reports go to >humans ;) >Generally people who halve some idea of what they are doing don't >bother with RFC's, perhaps the problem is with the software >documentation as that's what they tend to go for. So, generally do you recommend us not to follow RFC and risk possible issues that are currently unseen? I prefer fixing the RFC instead. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.