Re: What does "UNCHECKED" really mean?
Nick Tait <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:52:03 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.amavis.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/06/2025 20:02, Damian wrote: >> Messages with ambiguous content should be treated as a security risk. >> In particular, if MIME::Parser is used in an email security tool, >> ambiguous messages should not be delivered to end-users. > > Per default, Amavis delivers them, but flags them as "CC_UNCHECKED,3", > which is a dedicated subcategory for this case. > Thanks Damian. It looks like the source of my confusion was the assumption that the addition of the header "X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at tait.net.nz" to the message meant that the message had been virus-scanned, but what it was really saying was that it had tried to scan the message, but was unable to parse the multi-part sections due to the extra "Content-Transfer-Encoding" header within the section. And as a consequence it flagged the message as being UNCHECKED. Makes sense to me now. Thanks for your help. Nick.