Re: FW: spam scores being neutralized by bayes

Bob <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.virus.maiamailguard
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I've noticed that the problem I have with spam getting through is the 
spamassassin rule RP_MATCHES_RCVD. This rule is set at -1.429 and 
spammers know this. My ham doesn't need this rule. I tried to change its 
value in local.cf (score RP_MATCHES_RCVD 0.01), but it isn't working. Is 
there something I need to do with maia? I know we don't use spamd so 
that can't be it. Any thoughts?

I don't think Bayes is the culprit with me. It's the RP_MATCHES rule the 
spammers are tripping.

Thanks,
Bob

On 7/14/2015 2:00 AM, Jason Street wrote:
> Thank you all,
>
> Joshua, I think this is the route I'll have to take, bayes just 
> appears to be problematic at this stage.  Any spam actually being 
> caught as spam, removing bayes is not going to do much score wise
>
> I have seen a massive increase in spam getting through, all coming 
> from .eu and .xyz addresses and all being allowed through thanks to 
> Bayes  doing a "-1.900 BAYES_00"
>
>
> Although maybe just as worryingly, I've had spam hit the bayes rule 
> *and*  "-2.200 RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED".   Looks like the spammers are 
> getting better...
>
> 1.347     RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET     Received via a relay in 
> bl.spamcop.net
> 0.100     DKIM_SIGNED     Domain Keys Identified Mail: message has a 
> signature
> 0.010     T_REMOTE_IMAGE     (No description provided)
> 0.001     HTML_MESSAGE     HTML included in message
> -0.001     SPF_PASS     SPF: sender matches SPF record
> -0.001     RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED     Participates in the IADB system
> -0.001     RCVD_IN_IADB_SENDERID     IADB: Sender publishes Sender ID 
> record
> -0.010     T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD     Envelope sender domain matches 
> handover relay domain
> -0.059     RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF     IADB: Sender publishes SPF record
> -0.100     DKIM_VALID     Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK 
> signature
> -0.235     RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS     IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
> -1.470     RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN     IADB: All mailing list mail is opt-in
> -1.900     BAYES_00     Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
> -2.200     RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED     ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for 
> sender
>
>
>
> ¬¬JS
>
>
> On 2015-07-08 23:13, Joshua Small wrote:
>> Your point below was always my issue with Bayes. The whole "you just
>> need to train it" argument might be fine for users of this list, but
>> the customers running these products are comparing them to everything
>> else on the market, which "just works".
>>
>> Given I pretty much never saw Bayes trained correctly, I've only ever
>> seen bayes fall into these categories: Spam flagged as spam that would
>> have been captured by other rules anyway, spam that would have been
>> flagged and quarantined if not for an incorrect negative bayes score,
>> and mail flagged as spam by Bayes that was a false positive. In short,
>> I disabled bayes on all my environments.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maia-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of Jason Street
>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 2015 9:13 PM
>> To: Blake Hudson
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Maia-users] spam scores being neutralized by bayes
>>
>> On 2015-07-07 15:23, Blake Hudson wrote:
>>> Jason, it sounds like your Bayes database has learned SPAM. This could
>>> be from incorrect user reports (messages were reported as NOT SPAM
>>> when they were SPAM) or from auto learning.
>>
>> Potentially but the users are pretty hands off and ignore their cache
>> contents in the web interface, except for checking the spam cache for
>> anything valid caught.
>>
>> For the most occasion "non-spam cache" is ignored and left to be auto 
>> cleared.
>>
>>> My suggestion is to turn off auto learning (bayes_auto_learn 0 in
>>> local.cf) and use Maia's digest function to confirm HAM/SPAM daily in
>>> order to train bayes. To help speed up the learning you may want to
>>> clear out your current bayes db. You can do this with the
>>> maiadbtool.pl script and the --clear-bayes option.
>>
>> Forgive me ignorance  but how do I do the digest function you suggest?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maia-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.renaissoft.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maia-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.renaissoft.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maia-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.renaissoft.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/maia-users

_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.renaissoft.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.