Re: Postfix hold
George Papamichelakis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHhLBrF7_r_j0JcsAMDHFemn2wjo5rO9==bdpL-FAJ8J-c1QTA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 02:26 Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/2/21 4:09 PM, George Papamichelakis wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > If I use mailscanner as suggested by documentation by putting all > > incoming mails on hold does that rule out any additional rules I put in > > header_checks file ? Since they come after the hold rule which is first. > > You can use the milter option instead which doesn't hold mmessages with > header checks. My configuration for enabling the milter option is > > Doc is at > < > https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/blob/master/doc/MailScanner%20Milter%20Guide.pdf > > > I already tried that, it works but in the logs I see that a milter discard action is triggered but the mails are delivered. Then some users reported that it brakes outgoing mails , no headers almost , everything converted to plain text etc. Unfortunately I this is on alive machine That was working with postfix/mailscanner for more than ten years now. I was forced to stop using mailscanner as the hold portion of the system was used to flood the machine with backscatter messages, the only way to stop it was this and add rules in the header_checks file (and body). The previous setup was working ok but I don't want to risk getting into the same situation again. George > -- > Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner > > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner