Re: MSMilter and spf
Maarten via MailScanner <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> Sun, 24 Oct 2021 22:34:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
When setting up my mailserver a few years ago I did have a look at amavis-new because it is officially supported by Postfix on the Postfix add-on page. But I ended up going with Mailscanner because I found it easier to configure and I haven't regretted it since even though I have been using the traditional way since I did my first mailserver build a few years ago. It's just nice being able to use a milter now knowing that it's an officially supported way because of it being a milter even though I never missed any mail the traditional way. I will be continuing to use the msmilter(and mailscanner) and hopefully postfix.org will come to their senses soon and change that entry on their page because it can't be for nothing that so many people are using mailscanner :) I was even using mailscanner at my work for the mailrouters the traditional way until someone higher up decided to replace it all with Office 365 :( I will keep running it on my vps hosting my personal mail, so I am looking forward to the development of MailScanner and MSmilter! Does the Mailscanner development team need any donations, because I can donate at a later time. Just know I am representing one person and not a company :) Maarten Maarten On 10/24/21 21:57, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote: > > You are welcome. I did this so that mailscanner would have a compliant > way of interacting with postfix. Sadly, postfix.org, despite the > enhancement, still has mailscanner discouraged. I told Weitze about > the new feature, even. :( > > Development continues...I plan to hopefully add ithread support to the > milter, which will be a more modern cpu handling compared to > traditional prefork or postfork methods. > > On 10/24/21 2:57 PM, Maarten via MailScanner wrote: >> Thanks! I was using 2 and it was working but since I found out the >> default version >> of the Postfix version I am running is 6 I switched over to 6 since >> MailScanner is >> tested with that version but both worked. I have been running the >> msmilter for a >> day now and working great! Only thing I ran into was selinux which I >> fixed by adding to my custom policy. Thank you so much Shawn for >> creating >> the msmilter! :) >> >> On 10/24/21 20:44, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote: >>> >>> Default (version 6) is what it has been built and tested on. >>> >>> On 10/24/21 7:27 AM, Maarten via MailScanner wrote: >>>> Mesed up with the font color: >>>> >>>> Just one question which milter protocol version does msmilter need? >>>> >>>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol >>>> http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html >>>> >>>> Or will the default version suffice? >>>> /etc/postfix/main.cf <http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html>: >>>> # Postfix ≥ 2.6 >>>> milter_protocol >>>> <http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol> = 6 >>>> # 2.3 ≤ Postfix ≤ 2.5 >>>> milter_protocol >>>> <http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol> = 2 >>>> >>>> On 10/24/21 13:25, Maarten via MailScanner wrote: >>>>> Just one question which milter protocol version does msmilter need? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol >>>>> http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html >>>>> >>>>> Or will the default version suffice? >>>>> /etc/postfix/main.cf <http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html>: >>>>> # Postfix ≥ 2.6 >>>>> milter_protocol >>>>> <http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol> = 6 >>>>> # 2.3 ≤ Postfix ≤ 2.5 >>>>> milter_protocol >>>>> <http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol> = 2 >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner