Re: SPF checks on Mailscanner
Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:35:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Since this is concerning pypolicyd-spf and python-pyspf, unless somehow MailScanner is at play here, I don't think this is a MailScanner issue. Can you bypass MailScanner and test again? On 2/5/22 11:13, Pramod Daya via MailScanner wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Running MailScanner 5.3.4-3 on Centos 7, I’m using, for SPF checking: > > pypolicyd-spf-1.3.2-5.el7.noarch > > python-pyspf-2.0.14-13.el7.noarch > > Using these policyd-spf.conf settings: > > debugLevel = 2 > > defaultSeedOnly = 1 > > HELO_reject = SPF_Not_pass > > Mail_From_reject = Fail > > PermError_reject = False > > TempError_Defer = False > > skip_addresses = 127.0.0.0/8,::ffff:127.0.0.0/104,::1 > > Which seems to work fine, as it issues warnings to servers that aren’t > authorised to send for domains that don’t have SPF records set up > correctly. However, when I do a command line test from a remote > (unauthorised) server to send mail through this server, it happily > accepts the mail, even though the unauthorised server is not in the > SPF list. The sending server is not whitelisted, I can’t understand > why it doesn’t get rejected by the SPF check. > > Some advice or pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you. > > *___________________________________________________* > > *Pramod Daya*/(/CEO) > > /M.Sc. Computer Science (U. of Oregon)/ > > Unit 5, Melomed Office Park > > Punters Way, Kenilworth > > Cape Town, South Africa 7708 > > www.mindspring.co.za <http://www.mindspring.co.za/> > > > > **** > > *Work: * +27 21 657 1780 > > *Fax: *+27 21 671 7599 > > *Cell:*+27 83 675 0367 > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner