Re: Spam with certain size has spam score of 0
PenguinWhispererThe <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:13:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACtG2e0fFUaeaXba7vjy+y9sbFbMOquJ92dS6vhOm1AJ=AaXOw@mail.gmail.com> |
Anyone has ideas about this? On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 16:37, PenguinWhispererThe < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using Mailscanner with Mailwatch. > In Mailwatch I see messages are marked as OK while I'd have expected it to > be caught (I'm aware not all spam can be caught though). However spam > messages get often through. It seems like basically 50% of spam is a false > negative. > > So I looked a bit how I can improve this. > > In Mailwatch I see at the bottom: > Spam Report: Score: "large" Matching Rule: "too" > SpamAssassin score is 0. Size is e.g. 257kb. Almost all spam that gets > through is like this. > > The domain in the TO field in the headers is not one of the domains that > my mailserver handles which is confusing. (not an open relay though, but I > do have some kind of catchall: *@example.com goes to the same mailbox > apart from some exceptions) > > Now from my interpretation of what I see in Mailscanner the message is not > being sent through SpamAssassin since the message size is too big and so it > uses 0 as the score. Is that correct? > > I have looked into the Maximum Message Size setting: > Maximum Message Size = %rules-dir%/max.message.size.rules > > And in this rule file I only have this: > FromOrTo: default 0 > > This is the default. I looked at the other samples in that file but they > actually do set a limit while 0 seems to be "no limit". So I don't > understand why these bigger messages are skipped while for smaller ones SA > is invoked and seems to work properly. > > Anyone who can lead me in the right direction? Suggestions? Ideas? > > Thanks! > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner