Re: "Spam Actions" setting containing attachment and deliver not encapsulating message
Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> Mon, 5 Sep 2022 16:25:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/issues/607 On 9/5/22 15:32, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote: > > Ahh, the header still has the old boundary. That is a problem. > > On 9/5/22 15:23, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote: >> >> Interesting, apparently the client is interacting with the way >> MailScanner is encapsulating the message. The raw message is >> encapsulated, but my client (Thunderbird) is ignoring it and parsing >> just the inner MIME tree. >> >> >> On 9/5/22 15:06, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote: >> >>> Confirmed unexpected behavior, more debugging and testing in progress. >>> >>> On 8/30/22 08:50, Ricky Boone wrote: >>>> Thank you, Shawn, for the quick response. If there's anything I >>>> can do to help with either the research and/or troubleshooting >>>> around this, please let me know. I am by no means a competent Perl >>>> dev, but my management is very interested in getting this working >>>> properly (not meaning to add any pressure or assume expectations), >>>> and I'm a bit stuck at the moment. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 4:22 PM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner >>>> <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> That doesn't seem desirable. This should be reproduceable, so >>>> give me some time to lab this up and see what I can find out. >>>> It wouldn't be the first time we've found interesting things >>>> lurking in the perl mines. >>>> >>>> On 8/23/22 14:34, Ricky Boone wrote: >>>>> >>>>> *Warning: This message originated from outside the >>>>> organization. Use caution when following links or opening >>>>> attachments.* >>>>> >>>>> I'm troubleshooting an issue with a setting change we're >>>>> trying to test in our environment to provide users with >>>>> notifications that a message was flagged as spam, and why, as >>>>> well as to attach the original message to that notification. >>>>> >>>>> Based on the configuration docs and previous conversations, >>>>> this should be handled by including 'attachment' in the Spam >>>>> Actions setting (though some references note 'attachment' >>>>> along with 'deliver'). What I'm seeing, however, is that it >>>>> is not behaving as described. When the rule only includes >>>>> 'attachment', no message is fully delivered. When it includes >>>>> 'attachment' and 'deliver' (regardless of order, understanding >>>>> that it shouldn't matter), I get the message with the >>>>> '{Spam?}' subject prefix, but otherwise not encapsulated and >>>>> not including a notification message. When attempting with >>>>> 'attachment' and 'notify', I only get the notification, and if >>>>> 'attachment', 'deliver', and 'notify' are included, I get both >>>>> the non-encapsulated spam message and the notification without >>>>> an attachment. >>>>> >>>>> Prior to opening an issue in the GitHub project, I just want >>>>> to be sure I'm not doing something incorrectly. >>>>> >>>>> For reference, I'm currently running MailScanner 5.3.3 (aware >>>>> that there are newer versions, but none that appear to be >>>>> relevant to address this issue based on the changelog) on >>>>> CentOS 7 with postfix as the MTA, along with MailWatch >>>>> 1.2.15. Spam Actions points to a custom rules file with a >>>>> default (FromOrTo) action set to 'store notify header >>>>> "X-Spam-Status: Yes"', but I have a To email address for >>>>> testing with 'store attachment deliver header "X-Spam-Status: >>>>> Yes"' (though I've tried this without deliver, removing store >>>>> and header, with notify, etc.). >>>>> >>>>> The logs seem to reflect my settings, depending on what I've >>>>> saved and reloaded. For example, if I have attachment and >>>>> deliver set, I see this in the logs: >>>>> >>>>> Aug 23 14:03:37 MailScanner[24433]: Delivery of spam: message >>>>> 0BD1220625B0.AB434 from [removed] to [removed] with subject >>>>> Re: Test message >>>>> Aug 23 14:03:37 MailScanner[24433]: Spam Actions: message >>>>> 0BD1220625B0.AB434 actions are attachment,store,deliver,header >>>>> Aug 23 14:03:39 MailScanner[24433]: Requeue: >>>>> 0BD1220625B0.AB434 to E965720625AA >>>>> >>>>> And if I have only attachment set: >>>>> >>>>> Aug 23 11:57:15 MailScanner[22466]: Non-delivery of spam: >>>>> message 8225F206258E.AB9CA from [removed] to [removed] with >>>>> subject Test message >>>>> Aug 23 11:57:15 MailScanner[22466]: Spam Actions: message >>>>> 8225F206258E.AB9CA actions are attachment,store,header >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> MailScanner mailing list >>>> mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] >>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner